Misc.

Task 21 was to add Flickr photostream to my blog. Nice and easy, but I'm not sure whether the photos remain static, or change as I add things to Flickr. I would really like to be able to select which photos to display. But happily, for now, those on show are ones I took during the snow earlier this year, and complement each other (and my blog colour). I've even been approached by some company, via Flickr, to ask if they can shortlist one of the photos from the same batch for a guide to Oxford.

Task 22 is one that I did some while ago - adding Delicious to my igoogle page. In fact, most of this second task involved revisiting things that we did near the start of 23Things, such as browsing the Editor's choice of gadgets on igoogle. They are mostly not impressive. I tried the Literary quote of the day for two days, and it is unbearably naff as well as being dull. I have stuck with the BBC Good Food daily recipe, and I've just added a few more things (dictionary, earth at night, clouds, search youtube), so will see how I get on with those. Things with adds are much too fussy to display, so any that I wanted to have there (including hotmail) have been given the push, or, if they have to stay, are minimized. Am pleased with Clouds, powered by Google maps. As with Google earth, I love how you can roll the image around.

Office 2.0

Google docs.

I already use Google docs for spreadsheets, and find them fairly intuitive and immensely helpful. I know others report sluggishness, which is a definite downside. I was also unable to access Google docs for several hours whilst in the middle of important work with a very tight deadline, and found that deeply frustrating. And it's overly complicated to save docs to hard drive or to email them (compulsory conversion to PDF for the latter was very annoying), but I saw some suggestion in the "new features" list that this has now been revised. I've yet to test it. Overall, the positives outweigh the negatives, and it is definitely something I shall continue to use.

I'd not used the text documents, nor the form. I didn't even know what a form was. Text docs seem fine - I don't mind having minimal features, as those that I would use most often are all there. The form doc is great! I'm not sure how I would use it at work, but for personal use it is very easy to set up, and looks good. The retrieval of answers is also straightforward.

Here is my form:

I also tried the presentation doc, and again, very easy to use.

ThinkFree

I'd never heard of this. I had a go via Internet Explorer, as couldn't access Google chrome on the shared computer I was using. It was quite slow, and I gather this is simply a problem with accessing it through an old browser. The text doc. features seemed fine (certainly more than in Google), and the note doc. offers a series of very easy-to-use layouts, including one for a newsletter, which could be useful.

Again, I found it hard to tell where (and indeed whether) documents were being saved.

Wikis

Had a look at the Oxford web 2.0 wiki at http://socialouls.wetpaint.com, and only found one instance of OULS to change to "Bodleian Libraries". Doing so was straightforward. I'd not really heard of wikis as such, though I confess to using Wikipedia quite frequently for a quick overview of a subject and for further references (when a source such as DNB cannot help).

For the second "thing", I had a look at the Wikipedia entry on Walter of Chatillon, and made a couple of changes to the page. We'll see how long they stay there. I suspect not for very long, if online accounts of ruthless Wikipedia editors are true. I would never have thought of changing or adding to an entry before, so was surprised to find myself having a go. I can see how it could, for some, become an obsession, as well as being extremely time-consuming. For this latter reason, I suspect I am unlikely to tinker much in the future.

Twitter

I've been intrigued by Twitter for a while, and felt I was perhaps missing out on something by not using it. Signing up was fairly straightforward, but once in it's baffling. I tried the sites recommended on 23Things for library/librarian tweets, and got a bit carried away, signing up all the librarians listed on the first list. I then panicked, as people started to follow me. It feels intuitively wrong to befriend strangers, so I removed them all from my following section. I didn't know, of course, that each of them would be notified that I was following them, and so now have the embarrassing situation of being followed by some people who thought I was following them, but whom I had since removed from my list. I hadn't realised that there would be such immediate and visible responses to following people.

I can see some fun in following Twitter for personal use, but have yet to be convinced in the work sphere. I think more familiarity and time to browse are needed here.

I'm about to have a go at more advanced Twitter activities for Thing 16, and I expect similarly embarrassing and chaotic events to ensue.

After a pause, not much more to report. I am finding it difficult to find anything very worthwhile.

Baffled by and none too excited about LinkedIn. It seems to be primarily commercial, and I have been having great trouble working out which bits of my information are now public. I am sort of hoping that none of them are visible. I am also not going to share the contents of my various address books with it.

I can see that there might be some point to having a "professional" networking site, though I wonder about the real point of this in the public sphere.

Not sure I shall use this much.

Libraries and Facebook

Several Oxford libraries have a Facebook page, and use it to offer various sorts of information: openings hours, news, new books, photographs. Several also have search boxes on the page for online catalogues (COPAC, jstor, WorldCat). I'm sure these boxes have a technical name. And links are also provided to blogs, twitter, and other services.

My initial thought, again, is that much of the material there is duplicated elsewhere, and I wonder how useful it really is to maintain yet another site.

Podcasts

I've fallen behind again, on account of failing to acquire any headphones for the audio tasks. I've now kindly been sent some by the User-Ed. department. I've just had a quick look at the main podcast sites listed in our instructions. I am impressed with the University of Oxford site in particular. It's wonderful to be able to listen to lectures remotely. I hope it doesn't tempt students not to go to lectures, but as a resource in general, it's fantastic. The BBC list was also quite good, and fairly easy to use.

With the major podcast sites, it is hard to know exactly what one is listening to. I could listen to something on Medieval Monasticism, or on the buying and selling of Rare Books (both of which I tried), but without knowing who is doing them, I find it hard to put any trust in what is being said. Is there a way, on these podcast sites, of seeing more information about the source?

I can see that some podcasts from reputable sources might be nice to link to from a departmental homepage.

It seems easier to see where the information is coming from on Youtube. The description tends to be fuller than those I found for podcasts. There is a staggering amount out there to do with libraries, special collections, and book production techniques, some of which could be useful (after much viewing and filtering). The University "channels" appear to be, unsurprisingly, a safer bet, and there seems to be much worth looking at there.